Rural,  Communities,  Integration,  Systems,  Issues,  Funding,  Remote,  Policy,  DEI,  Advocacy,  Certified Nurse-Midwives,  Caregivers,  Profession of Nursing,  Innovation,  Advanced Practice RNs,  Workforce,  Registered Nurses,  Voices,  Featured

Professional Nurses as Policy Leaders – Post #3

Nurses are involved in policy to advocate for improved healthcare and to improve health inequities. Affirming the passion of a nurse to support policies that protect and empower the weakest among us would be incomplete without a moment to honor Alex Petti as an inspiration.

Here is an example of one nurse’s inspiration and motivation to work in policy. She highlights the policy efforts of the American Nephrology Nursing Association (ANNA).

Returning to the Issue of Nursing as a Profession in Regulatory Language

In the first post related to a current policy concern, we described the challenges of rural and remote healthcare and how solving health inequities in those locations relies in part on a vibrant stream of dedicated advanced practice nurses in the workforce. We acknowledged the proposed policy change in how nursing is defined as a profession (or not) in regulatory language and how that would affect loan caps for advanced practice graduate programs, essentially crimping the workforce pipeline. In our second post, we delved deeper into professionalism, the regulatory framework, and the stakeholders involved in the proposed change. In this post, we get into the nitty-gritty of rule-making and exactly how the process is unfolding to either put the change officially in place or reconsider whether the proposal makes sense.

A Federal Regulatory Issue

As explained previously, the current debate revolves around how the U.S. Department of Education (ED) plans to implement changes required by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Public Law 119-21), which amended the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965. Title IV governs federal student aid, including the definition of a “professional degree” used for determining federal loan limits and eligibility under the Direct Loan program. Under the negotiated regulatory language agreed upon by ED and its rulemaking committee, the definition of professional degree in 34 C.F.R. § 668.2 will include only a narrow list of fields (e.g., medicine, dentistry, law, pharmacy, optometry, veterinary medicine, chiropractic, podiatry, clinical psychology, and theology) tied to specific Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) codes, and does not explicitly include nursing programs such as MSN, DNP, or NP degrees; programs outside those listed would be treated as general graduate programs with lower loan limits and different borrowing caps under Title IV.

What Happens Next?

The rulemaking process goes like this: The statutory trigger happened when Congress amended the Higher Education Act of 1965 and directed the U.S. Department of Education to implement changes through regulation. The Negotiated Rulemaking has been completed under 20 U.S.C. section 1098a. ED convened a negotiated rulemaking committee. Stakeholders included institutions, accreditors, and others. Consensus was not reached on the definition of the professional degree; therefore, ED is legally permitted to proceed with its proposed language. ED published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register. This notice proposes a regulatory definition of “professional degree.” It lists qualifying programs, omits nursing programs, and invites public comment.

As of the date of this post, we are in the Public Comment period, which usually lasts 30-60 days and, in this instance, ends on March 2, 2026. Nursing organizations, universities, states, and individuals can submit comments, which become part of the administrative record and must be reviewed by the ED.

Submit Comments Now

Here is how to submit comments: Go to regulations.gov. In the search bar, enter the rule title: Reimagining and Improving Student Education (or search by the U.S. Department of Education). Click the rule labeled “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). Click Comment. Paste your comment or upload a document (PDF or Word). Enter your name/organization (optional but recommended for credibility). Submit. You will receive a confirmation number — save it.

Or, you can access the comment portal through the policy pages of various professional nursing organizations. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing provides easy access to the comment portal and exemplary language depending on your position and title. Click Here. (Policy Watch, n.d.)

The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, n.d.) published its early response to this issue in November 2025. The organization subsequently developed a resource page addressing the issue, which includes a survey summarizing the profound impact of this change, links to sign a petition, links to contact Congressional representatives, links to receive alerts, and an ongoing blog of related news and issues unfolding since November 2025 (AACN Alarmed Over Department of Education’s Proposed Limitation of Student Loan Access for Nursing, n.d.; Proposed Federal Loan Changes for Nursing Students, n.d.).

After comments close, ED must review the comments, address significant issues raised, and either revise the rule or justify keeping it as written. ED publishes the Final rule in the Federal Register, including the final regulatory text, a section called “Analysis of Comments and Changes,” and ED’s justification for its decisions. The definition becomes a binding federal regulation. At that point, the rule can be challenged legally by judicial review.

There are many resources available to nurses who want to learn to be advocates in policy and understand the tools available to them. Here are two:

NLN Public Policy Toolkit

NLN Policy Action Page

For a deeper dive into the connection of policy to improving health equity, here is a presentation by a leading national voice in nursing (Carolina Nursing, 2019).

References

AACN Alarmed Over Department of Education’s Proposed Limitation of Student Loan Access for Nursing. (n.d.). AACN. Retrieved January 31, 2026, from https://www.aacnnursing.org/news-data/all-news/aacn-alarmed-over-department-of-educations-proposed-limitation-of-student-loan-access-for-nursing

Carolina Nursing. (2019, March 20). A conversation with Sue Hassmiller – The Future of Nursing Report 2020-2030 [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/9nLZeE-R5ek

Congressional Research Service. (2025, December 17). The Department of Education’s Proposed Rule to Define “Professional Student” (CRS Report R48768). https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48768

National League for Nursing. (n.d.). Advocacy Action Center. Default. Retrieved February 3, 2026, from https://www.nln.org/public-policy/advocacy-action-center

Policy Watch: Actions to Take: Nursing as a Professional Degree. (n.d.). AACN. Retrieved February 12, 2026, from https://www.aacnnursing.org/news-data/all-news/article/policy-watch-actions-to-take-nursing-as-a-professional-degree

Proposed Federal Loan Changes for Nursing Students. (n.d.). Retrieved January 31, 2026, from https://www.aacnnursing.org/policy-advocacy/take-action/nursing-is-a-professional-degree

U.S. Department of Education. (2026, January 30). Reimagining and Improving Student Education: Proposed Definition of a Professional Degree Program (Proposed Rule). Federal Register. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/01/30/2026-01912/reimagining-and-improving-student-education

Deborah Acker

Deborah Acker, JD, DNP, MSN, CNM, FACNM | Healthcare Systems & Workforce Innovation | Education | Clinical, Legal & Academic Integration | Rural & Perinatal Care

3 Comments

  • kvoytill@asu.edu

    kvoytill@asu.edu

    This post is such a clear illustration of why nurses, especially DNP‑prepared nurses, must see themselves as policy actors, not just policy recipients. The proposed exclusion of nursing from the federal definition of a “professional degree” is not a technical detail; it is a structural decision with direct implications for funding, workforce capacity, and health equity. By constraining loan access for MSN, DNP, NP, and CNM programs, the rule would narrow the pipeline of advanced practice RNs at the very moment when rural and underserved communities depend on them to sustain access to primary care, maternal health, and chronic disease management (American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN], n.d.-a; Congressional Research Service, 2025). This is a classic example of misalignment between education policy and healthcare system needs. A regulation designed in one silo inadvertently undermines national goals for workforce expansion, innovation, and equity in another. The way you walk through the rulemaking process, including statutory trigger, negotiated rulemaking, NPRM, public comment, and final rule, also demystifies how power actually moves in federal policy and where nurses can intervene (U.S. Department of Education, 2026).

    I especially appreciate the way you frame advocacy as both a professional responsibility and a practical skill set. The resources you highlight from AACN and NLN show nurses exactly how to translate concern into action: submitting comments, signing petitions, contacting legislators, and staying informed through policy alerts (AACN, n.d.-a; AACN, n.d.-b; National League for Nursing, n.d.). This is the kind of integration we talk about in DNP programs, linking regulatory language to workforce realities, and then to patient outcomes and health equity. If nursing is excluded from the professional degree category, the downstream effects will not only be fewer APRNs and CNMs in the workforce, but also reduced capacity to address inequities in rural and remote communities, where advanced practice nurses often serve as the backbone of the system (Congressional Research Service, 2025). Your post models what it looks like for professional nurses to step into policy leadership: understanding the issue, naming the stakes for the profession and the public, and offering concrete pathways for engagement. It’s exactly the kind of policy literacy and advocacy orientation the Future of Nursing reports have been calling for (Carolina Nursing, 2019).

    References

    American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (n.d.-a). AACN alarmed over Department of Education’s proposed limitation of student loan access for nursing. https://www.aacnnursing.org/news-data/all-news/aacn-alarmed-over-department-of-educations-proposed-limitation-of-student-loan-access-for-nursing

    American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (n.d.-b). Policy watch: Actions to take—Nursing as a professional degree. https://www.aacnnursing.org/news-data/all-news/article/policy-watch-actions-to-take-nursing-as-a-professional-degree

    Carolina Nursing. (2019). A conversation with Sue Hassmiller – The Future of Nursing Report 2020–2030 [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/9nLZeE-R5ek

    Congressional Research Service. (2025). The Department of Education’s proposed rule to define “professional student” (CRS Report R48768). https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48768

    National League for Nursing. (n.d.). Advocacy Action Center. https://www.nln.org/public-policy/advocacy-action-center

    U.S. Department of Education. (2026). Reimagining and improving student education: Proposed definition of a professional degree program (Proposed rule). Federal Register. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/01/30/2026-01912/reimagining-and-improving-student-education

    ** Please note– unable to adjust formatting (italics, etc.) when commenting***

  • Deborah Acker

    Deborah Acker

    (KVOYTIL),

    Thank you for your comment.

    I appreciate the time it takes to consider the information and reflect back your wise and constructive perspective.

    Tomorrow is the deadline for public comments. We shall see what unfolds.

  • lmfranc5@asu.edu

    lmfranc5@asu.edu

    Hi Deborah. I appreciate your call to action and the step-by-step instructions for advocating for our profession. This ruling for the Department of Education is concerning and harmful to nursing as a whole and potentially devastating for the medical community overall, given the restrictions on loans you mentioned (Congressional Research Service, 2026). As I am reading your post on March 9, the deadline for public comments on this ruling has been reached, and we are awaiting new information before this change is implemented in July 2026.

    I found a letter that members of Congress sent to Congress on February 27, 2026, regarding their disapproval of changes to professional and graduate degrees in the Big Beautiful Bill (Courtney et al., 2026). It is important that members of Congress continue to speak out against this change, and that individuals like us continue to advocate for ourselves. Because nurses and medical professionals are a minority within Congress and government positions, it can be difficult for legislators to truly understand or care about the impact of these changes. This gives us, as nurses, even more reason to voice our opinions and make it clear why these changes are harmful and what effects they could have on the overall population and the medical community.

    This has also been a big topic in the news within the nursing community, and hopefully the education community as a whole. Being DNP-prepared nurses gives us a greater understanding of policy and advocacy, and I agree with your call for individuals to use their voices to demand change.

    References
    Congressional Research Service. (2026, February 24). The Department of Education’s Proposed Rule to Define “Professional Student” (CRS Report R48768). https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48768

    Courtney, J., Himes, J., Hayes, J., DeLauro, R. L., & Larson, J. B. (2026, February 27). RE: ED-2025-OPE-0944. Connecticut Delegation Congress Members. https://courtney.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/courtney.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/02-27-26-ct-delegation-rise-nprm-comment-letter.pdf

Leave a Reply